![]() |
![]() |
|
Parents'
views on television violence
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Students of the Education and Psychology Department at USP recently undertook one of the largest surveys of the views of parents about television violence in Fiji. As an undergraduate project carried out in the Human Development course, ED/PS151, students were asked to answer the following questions:
Over 240 students each interviewed an average of 15 parents, making a total of about 3,600 parents interviewed. Each parent had an average of three children and in most families, at least one of the children had reached 10 years old. Each parent was asked a series of standard questions about their views of violence on television. They were first asked a question about the amount of violence on television. This is what they thought:
The parents were then asked what they thought the effect of the violence on their children was:
They were then asked what they thought the television company should do:
Finally they were asked if they had any suggestions that they would like to add. The most popular additional suggestions were:
One enterprising student contacted Fiji One Television and asked the head of programming about their policy towards presenting violence. This was the reply: Fiji One television divides evening viewing into three periods:
Movies shown during the early evening slot are edited to be suitable for the family. Movies shown during the late evening are not edited. Movies considered suitable for adults only are prefaced with AO (adults only) and carry a warning about bad language, violence and sexual content. Programmes shown on the Sky channels are never edited for content. Warnings about content are given before the start of movies. Psychologists around the world have carried out hundreds of studies of the effects of television violence on children. The effects can be summarised as follows:
All violent programmes have an effect; even cartoon violence. The most harmful kind of programmes are those such as Walker, Texas Ranger and Smallville in which the heroes or good guys habitually use violence to solve problems, thus legitimising the use of violence generally. Parents, through the way they raise their children, are shaping the future of a culture and a nation, as well as of their own families. Their views are important and should be listened to and acted on. This study has shown that a large number of Fijis parents are concerned about the amount of violence shown on television and want something to be done to reduce it and to mitigate its effects. Many parents in Fiji recognise their own role in dealing with violence shown on television. Hopefully, through studies such as this, television companies will realise that more is expected of them too. Thanks are due to the students who carried out the study, the tutors who supervised them and the parents who gave their views and their time. Opinions expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily of the University of the South Pacific. Further Reading Bushman, B. J. and Anderson,
C. A. (2001). Media violence and the American public. American
Psychologist, 56, 477 489. Dr
Peter M. Forster PhD, Chartered Psychologist |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||