![]() |
Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice By Etienne Wenger |
|
Debate about the utility of knowledge
management continues today. This author, a recognized authority on the discipline, suggests that as long as we adopt a good model for managing knowledge, in this case, a doughnut, its practice can give a company a decided advantage. By Etienne Wenger Etienne Wenger is a consultant and researcher, and the co-author of (with R. McDermott and W. Snyder) Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. (Harvard Business School Press, 2002). The term "knowledge management"
has had its |
communities, which
decide what counts as relevant facts and acceptable explanations of these
facts. Knowing is not merely an individual experience, but one of exchanging
and contributing to the knowledge of a community. Knowledge from this
perspective is what our human communities have accumulated over time to
understand the world and act effectively in it. The management side of the term "knowledge management" has been less of a topic of discussion. Yet I believe that it is as productive a term to investigate. If by "manage" we mean to care for, grow, steward, make more useful, then the term knowledge management is rather apt. What form does such management take? And who should be doing it? In this article, I will argue that when it comes to knowledge, management is a doughnut. This doughnut is illustrated in Figure 1. And noting that the center of the doughnut is empty, I will argue that knowledge management is primarily the business of those who actually make the dough -- the practitioners. Some principles of knowledge management Knowledge management requires the proper organizational context. You need to have processes in place to coordinate the management of knowledge and integrate it into business processes such as technology for information flows, interpersonal connections, and document repositories, as well as institutional and cultural norms of paying attention to knowledge. However, while all of these are important enablers, they do not do knowledge management. Unless you are able to involve practitioners actively in the process, your ability to truly manage knowledge assets is going to remain seriously limited. It is their knowledge. They know how it affects their ability to do their work. They know what needs to be documented and what should be left as a tacit understanding. They know what form the documentation of their knowledge should take to be |
|
| >>>>>>>>>>L'articolo continua. Se sei interessato scarica da qui sotto (.pdf 595 Kb) | ||
|
Se
non lo sei ancora, clikka per leggere i dettagli
|
Quando
esce il form, inserisci Id e Password
|
|
Ti
ricordiamo anche che nessuna comunità vive se tutti i suoi
membri si limitano a prendere. Psicopolis si basa sullo scambio, quindi
ogni tanto dai un tuo contributo: NON SOLDI ma un intervento sulle
bacheche, oppure qualche materiale utile o una segnalazione interessante.
|
|
|
Attenzione,
se trovi il server occupato, riprova in orari diversi. Se hai difficoltà
a scaricare o ricevi un file corrotto,
.
Ogni programma è stato controllato con antivirus, ma Psicopolis
non risponde del funzionamento del software, che è reperito
in rete.
|
|
aggiornato