COMMUNICATION
THEORY WORKBOOK
SMALL GROUP COMMUNICATION
Translate
this Page!
Groupthink
Explanation
of Theory: The result when group cohesion leads all members
of the group to abandon realistic evaluation of the situation
and follow the corporate group ideal.
Theorists:
Irving Janis
Date:
1972
Primary Article:
Janis, I. L, (1972). Victims of Groupthink: A psychological
study of foreign-policy decisionos and fiascoes (2nd
edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Individual
Interpretations:
Groupthink is a theory that was developed in hindsight.
All of the examples given in the original theory were offered
post hoc which is problematic. Since its inception
it has been revisted and studies have raised viable questions
about the validity of the assumptions made in groupthink.
Metatheoretical
Assumptions:
Being a Scientific theory the following metatheoretical
assumption should be advanced.
Ontological
Assumptions:
Scientific research suggest that human nature is deterministic.
Humans do
not have control what they do.
Epistemological
Assumptions:
Scientific research suggests that there is one truth, or
big T truth.
Axiological
Assumptions:
Research should not be value laden. Research offers
objective results.
Critique:
Being a Scientific theory it should be critiqued using Chaffee
& Berger's criteria.
Explanatory
Power - Groupthink offers a concrete definition of what
will happen when groups become cohesive.
Predictive Power -Groupthink offers a explanation that if
a group becomes cohesive the group will make bad decisions.
Parsimony -Groupthink is a very simple theory that states
a cohesiveness within a group will lead to poor decision
making in the group.
Falsifiablity - Groupthink is a little short in this category.
There were no original criteria for groupthink so it is
hard to test. However, some researchers have attempted
to develop a scale to test groupthink.
Internal Consistency - Groupthink is argued by many researchers.
Some agree but new research suggests that groupthink should
be re-developed because it is not matching the current research
on effective decision-making and cohesiveness.
Heuristic Provocativeness - There are several new hypothesis
that can be offered about what happens in cohesive groups.
Researchers are working on new ideas as we speak.
Organizing Power - A major drawback on groupthink is there
was never a specific set of criteria of what groupthink
is so that it could be tested. There were only symptoms
to be interrupted by the researcher looking a group's decision.
Ideas and Implications:
It is very important to understand groupthink because of
the implications of groups in today's society. We
need to know why and how groups make bad decisions and groupthink
offers one explanation. However the theory of groupthink
should be carefully examined before it is offered as the
sole truth of what happens in groups.
Example:
The Abbaline Paradox
Relevant Research:
Hart, P.T. (1998). Preventing Groupthink
Revisited: Evaluating and Reforming Groups in Government.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73,
306-326.
Rothwell, J. D. (1998).
In mixed company: Small group communication.
Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Schafer, M. & Crichlow, S.
(1996). Antecedents of groupthink: a quantitative
study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40, 415-435
Whyte, G. (1998). Recasting
Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective
Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, 73, 185-209
Location
in Eight (8) Primary Communication Theory Textbooks:
Anderson, R., & Ross, V. (1998). Questions of communication:
A practical introduction to theory (2nd ed.). New York:
St. Martin's Press. N/A
Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D.C. (1998). Understanding
communication theory: The communicative forces for human
action. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. N/A
Griffin, E. (2000). A first look at communication theory
(4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. N/A
Griffin, E. (1997). A first look at communication theory
(3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 231-
Infante, D. A., Rancer, A. S., & Womack, D. F. (1997).
Building communication theory (3rd ed.). Prospect
Heights, IL: Waveland Press. N/A
Littlejohn, S. W. (1999). Theories of human communication
(6th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. N/A
West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2000). Introducing communication
theory: Analysis and application. Mountain View, CA:
Mayfield. N/A
Wood, J. T. (1997). Communication theories in action:
An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. N/A
|