THE SYSTEMS APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT
(circa 1945-1975) Fonte
"While we can conceive of a sum being composed gradually, a system ... is composed instantly" (von Bertalanffy)

    Following World War II and the work of March & Simon, there was increased interest in the use of quantitative (statistical, mathematical, computerized) methods in management (as administrative thought was beginning to be called). The "systems" movement, aka "the quantitative school" gave us numerous tools, such as PPBS (Planned Programmed Budgeting Systems), CIS (Computer Information Systems), and the whole field of Operations Research. It has turned out to provide a solid basis for the analysis of organizations, which are characterized as either "open" systems (which interact with and are influenced by their environment) or "closed" systems (which do not interact with their environment). A clock is an example of a closed system because assuming a power source, the clock needs no further outside environment to run properly. A plant is an example of an open system because it needs air and sunlight from the environment. Examples of environmental factors in criminal justice include clienteles, constituencies, law, politics, and technology.

    A "system" is defined as "an organized, unitary whole composed of two or more interdependent parts (subsystems) where the whole contains identifiable boundaries from its environment (suprasystem)." Systems must be viewed as a whole; changes in one part of the system affect the other parts. Organizations experience various conflicts, and rather than manage them away, a systems manager learns to take advantage of them. Below are the last names of a few of the lesser-known systems thinkers from this era:

  • von Bertalanffy (~1950) is generally regarded as the founder of "systems theory" and the broad sweep of its applications for almost all disciplines, the natural as well as the social sciences.
  • Ackoff (~1956) was a MIT professor who invented OR, "operations research", the creation of multi-disciplinary teams of experts used in simulations of war games.
  • Boulding, an economist known for popularizing "feedback loops" and "cybernetics", the analysis of inputs, throughputs, and outputs.
  • Starr, a decision theorist associated with OR and the concept of "suboptimization".
  • Forrester, a demographer who applied econometrics to urban problems and the field of city planning.
  • Parsons, a sociologist who studied action systems and the integration of subsystems.

    It is customary to note that systems theory represented the merger of many ideas from scientific management and from human relations management. It was indeed project-based, lending itself well to Gantt charts, and it also strived toward synergism (where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts) through humanistic management of at least the internal environment (the informal organization of the workers).

THE PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF SYSTEMS THEORY

    Much of systems theory resembles the scientific method: you hypothesize, design a controlled experiment, collect data, and analyze data. The purpose is to maintain the use of science in management to obtain "real time" results that can be used instantaneously to affect control in the organization (some have even accused systems theory of being "science in management" rather than a "science of management"). The goal is to maintain your attention on the whole at all costs. For managers, this means:

1. Define the company as a system
2. Establish system objectives (performance criteria)
3. Identify wider systems (the environment)
4. Create formal subsystems (including a humanistic, psychosocial subsystem)
5. Integrate the subsystems with the whole system (if not the subsystems themselves, whatever interrelates them with other subsystems)

SOME BETTER-KNOWN EXAMPLES OF SYSTEMS THEORIES

Robert Blake & Jane Mouton (1964) developed a theory known as the "Managerial Grid". It is based on two variables: focus on task and focus on relationships. The grid includes five possible leadership styles based on concern for task or concern for people. Using a specially designed testing instrument, people can be assigned a numerical score depicting their concern for each variable. Numerical indications, such as 9,1 or 9,9 or 1,9 or 1,1 or 5,5 can then be plotted on the grid using horizontal and vertical axes. Although their work is also often classified as a Leadership Theory, it is typical of the specially designed analysis and instruments of the systems theorists.

Victor Vroom (1964) studied the motivational and decision-making processes and developed what has come to be known as expectancy theory, (also known as equity theory as developed by Homans and other social psychologists). this approach attempts to measure the degree of desire to perform a behavior rather than the need to perform a behavior. Motivation strength is calculated by multiplying the perceived value of the result of performing a behavior by the perceived probability that the result will materialize. The idea that workers are driven by complex internal processes of motivation is sometimes known as expectancy theory.

Fred Fiedler (1967) devised a questionnaire called the "Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale" which could be used by management in various ways, but most importantly in this context to find out what integrates or interrelates the human subsystem. Fiedler believed in situational leadership, that some personality attributes contribute to effective leadership in some situations but not in others. The idea that there is no single best approach to leadership is sometimes known as contingency theory.