Psychology's formal "birthdate" as a science wasn't until
1879 (when Wilhelm Wundt established the first psychology laboratory). Of
course, industrial and organizational psychology weren't established until
sometime after that. Yet, many of the issues important to I/O psychology
had been discussed long before then. Below are just a few examples.
-
The Early Years (Pre-WW1)
-
1881: the first school of professional management was
started at the University of Pennsylvania when Joseph Wharton donated
$100,000 to do so
-
1883: Frederick W. Taylor began experiments at the Midvale
and Bethlehem Steel plant, which later led to the development of his
"scientific management" philosophy
-
1903:
W.L. Bryan, prior to the formation of I/O
psychology, gave a presidential address to APA in which he encouraged
psychologists to study "concrete activities and functions as the appear
in every day life". Although he didn't cite industry directly, he did
encourage these sorts of "real life" applications of a science of psychology.
- Postscript note: "The term 'industrial psychology'
first appeared in a 1904 article of Bryan's APA address. Ironically,
it appeared in print only as a typographical error. Bryan was quoting
a sentence he had written five years earlier in which he spoke of
the need for more research in individual psychology. Instead,
Bryan wrote industrial psychology and did not catch his mistake."
(source: Muchinsky, 1997, p10; emphasis added)
-
Walter Dill Scott gave a talk to Chicago business
leaders on the application of psychology to advertising, which led to
books on the topic published in 1903 & 1908.
- By 1911 he had published two more books (Influencing Men in Business
and Increasing Human Efficiency in Business), and became the first
to apply the principles of psychology to motivation and productivity
in the workplace.
- He also became instrumental in the application of personnel procedures
within the army during World War I.
-
Hugo Munsterberg, considered by many as "the
father of industrial psychology", pioneered the application of psychological
findings from laboratory experiments to practical matters
- In 1911 he cautioned managers to be concerned with "all the questions
of the mind...like fatigue, monotony, interest, learning, work satisfaction,
and rewards."
- He was also first to encourage government funded research in the
area of industrial psy
- In 1913 his book Psychology and Industrial Efficiency addressed
such things as personnel selection and equipment design
-
Munsterberg's early I/O psychology became influential
well into the 1950's
- It assumed people need to fit the organization, thus applied behavioral
sciences largely consisted of helping organizations shape people
to serve as replacement parts for organizational machines
-
about the same time as Munsterberg, Frederick W. Taylor
began publishing similar philosophies on management -- which had a tremendous
impact on organizational management
Frederick W. Taylor
-
Taylor realized the value of redesigning the work
situation (thru use of time and motion studies) to achieve both
higher output for the company and higher wages for the worker
-
His writings were one of the first reasonably comprehensive
philosophies of management
-
1909 Taylor's book Shop Management explained management's
role in motivating workers to avoid "natural soldiering", i.e.,
the natural tendency of people to "take it easy"
-
1911 Taylor's book
The Principles of Scientific
Management; two of his key principles:
- scientifically design work methods for efficiency
- select the best workers and train them in the best methods
- e.g., showed workers who handle heavy iron ingots more productive
given use of work rests
- training when to work and when to rest raised productivity
from 12.5 to 47.0 tons moved per day
- Less fatigue reported
- Increased wages
- Costs dropped from 9.2 to 3.9 cents per ton
-
Taylor's methods led to charges that he inhumanely
exploited workers for higher wages and that great numbers of workers
would be unemployed because fewer were needed (which was a sensitive
topic since unemployment was already high at the time)
- Both the Interstate Commerce Commission and the U.S. House
of Representatives began investigations
- Taylor replied that increased efficiency would produce greater
not lesser prosperity
- Outbreak of WWI distracted most from the controversy before
much was resolved
World War I (1917-1918)
-
Robert Yerkes was the psychologist most influential
in getting psychology into the war
- proposed ways of screening recruits for mental deficiency and
assigning selected recruits to army jobs
-
committees of psychologists also investigated soldier
motivation, morale, psychological problems of physical incapacity ("shell
shock"), and discipline
-
Army was skeptical and approved only a modest number
of proposals, primarily in the assessment of recruits -- which Yerkes
and others developed as a general intelligence test
-
Meanwhile
Walter Dill Scott was doing research
on best placement of soldiers in Army
- He classified and placed enlistees, conducted performance evaluations
of officers, and developed and prepared job duties and qualifications
for over 500 jobs
-
However, the final authorization for the testing program
came in August 1918, only three months before the Armistice was signed
-- thus the intelligence tests weren't as utilized as much as Yerkes
had hoped
-
1917:
Journal of Applied Psychology began publication
- Today is still perhaps the most respected, representative journal
in I/O field
Between the Wars (1919-1940)
-
Psychological Corporation started by James Cattell in
1921
- Main purpose was to advance psychology and promote its usefulness
to industry
- Also to maintain quality reputation of field by serving as a place
for companies to get reference checks on prospective psychologists
- Helped companies weed out quacks from qualified professionals
- Mission has shifted: Today serves as one of largest publishers
of psychological tests
-
1920's: doctoral degrees specializing in industrial
psychology begin to be offered at U.S. universities
- Among the first: Ohio State, Carnegie Institute of Technology,
Univ. of Minnesota, and Stanford University
-
Greatest influence on I/O psychology from this time
was the Hawthorne studies
The Hawthorne Studies
-
1924 series of experiments began at the Hawthorne Works
of the Western Electric Company
- Researchers from Harvard University (who were not psychologists)
were attempting to study the relation between lighting and efficiency
- Increased lighting resulted in increased efficiency, but to their
surprise, efficiency continued to improve as the lighting dimmed
to faint moonlight levels
- These seemingly "bizarre" results were eventually explained in
terms of previously unrecognized aspects of human behavior in the
workplace
- Researchers hypothesized that these results were due to the employee's
desire to please them
- They were flattered at having distinguished investigators
from Harvard study them and were trying to impress them, which
caused them to be more productive
- Quite some time later the employees got used to the researchers'
presence and began returning to their original levels of productivity
-
The Hawthorne Effect -- change in behavior following
the onset of a novel treatment (new or increased attention, most commonly)
- Effect eventually wears off (behavior returns to original) as
the "novelty" dissipates
-
1933
Elton Mayo made the first significant call
for the human relations movement in his interim report on the Hawthorne
studies
- Showed the existence of informal employee groups and their effects
on production, the importance of employee attitudes, the value of
a sympathetic and understanding supervisor, and the need to treat
people as people -- not simply as human capital
- This was one of the benchmark events in the development of industrial
psychology
-
1939 the definitive account of the Hawthorne studies
was published
Between the Wars: During and Shortly After the Hawthorne
Studies
-
Major advances in measurement of attitudes during 1920's
and 1930's
- Likert and Thurstone among those particularly prominent
-
One of the earliest with clinical roots to enter I/O
psychology was Morris Viteles
- Viteles was student of Lightner Witmer (who many consider the
father of clinical psych)
- Among Viteles' books were:
- Industrial Psychology (1932) (perhaps first book to
use that term in its title)
- The Science of Work (1934)
- Motivation and Morale in Industry (1953)
-
In 1939, Kurt Lewin led the first publication
of an empirical study of the effects of leadership styles; this work
initiated arguments for the use of participative management techniques
World War II (1941-1945)
-
By this time industrial psychologists had improved many
of their techniques for employee selection and placement, and were sought
after by the army for their help with these functions
- Successful I/O contributions included development of:
- Army General Classification Test
- used to classify an estimated 12 million soldiers into
military jobs
- Tests of performance under situational stress for U.S. Office
of Strategic Services
- the OSS was the first U.S. intelligence agency (precursor
to CIA)
- tests highly successful for identifying best candidates
to be OSS agents
- innovative assessment methods used
- original basis for assessment center techniques of
today
-
1945
Kurt Lewin formed the Research Center for
Group Dynamics at MIT to perform experiments in group behavior
- 1948 the research center moved to the University of Michigan and
became a branch of the Institute for Social Research
-
1946: I/O psychologists form Division 14 of the American
Psychological Association
- incorporated as the Society for Industrial and Organizational
Psychology in 1983
- by 1996, grown to approximately 2,500 members
1950's and 1960's
-
Late 40's & early 50's: clinical psychologists Carl
Rogers' and Abraham Maslow's theories of motivation supported the human
relations movement
-
Skinner initiated discussions of behaviorism's applications
to organizational settings
-
1954 Peter F. Drucker outlined his Management
by Objectives (MBO) approach
-
1954 John C. Flanigan outlined his Critical Incidents
Technique
-
Rise of Motivation Theories in late 1950's through
1960's
- Late 1950's: Douglas McGregor proposed his Theory X and
Theory Y assumptions of the relations between employees and organizations
- Early 1960's: contingency models of leadership proposed a need
for different styles under different circumstances -- a view that
rose with work of Fred Fiedler in mid 1960's
- 1964: Vroom's VIE theory (valence, instrumentality, expectancy)
of motivation proposed
- Influencial in development of later expectancy theories
- Mid 1960's: David McClelland proposed need for achievement
theory
- Argues there are two groups of people, the majority who aren't
concerned about achieving and the minority who are challenged
by achieving
-
1964 Civil Rights Act passed. Title VII, section 703a
states: "it is unlawful to discriminate in any employment practice on
the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin"
-
1966: Katz & Kahn published classic text outlining
theory and research of organizational behavior as embedded in open,
sociotechnical systems
-
Mid 1960's into early 1970's: advances in job analysis
techniques included:
- 'task inventory' approach developed from research with U.S. Air
Force
- Dictionary of Occupational Titles published in 1965 (third
edition)
- 1960's research at Purdue Occupational Research Center led to
publication of the Position Analysis Questionnaire in 1972
- Edwin Fleishman developed 'ability requirements' approach
1970's
-
1971: B.F. Skinner, in Beyond Freedom and
Dignity, advocated behavior modification strategies to motivate
people in organizations
-
Organizational behavior modification's successes increasingly
demonstrated
- e.g., in Luthans & Kreitner's (1975) and Frederiksen's (1982)
books
-
Rise of cognitive approaches to studying topics in psychology
(which grew in 1960's) continued in 1970's, including their influence
on a wide range of I/O research
-
Early 1970's: Porter & Lawler proposed revised expectancy
model of motivation
-
Early/mid 1970s: Civil rights laws, and related Supreme
Court decisions, led to increasing research on bias in organizations
1980's & 1990's
-
As entered 1980's, the rigidity of classical theories
of management produced harsh consequences for American businesses (e.g.,
in the automobile industry) during these times of rapid change in the
technological and business environments
- Japanese were prospering with methods first proposed by Americans:
Edward Deming, Joseph Juran, and Noam Crosby
- First adopted after WWII in Japan when U.S. companies resisted
their ideas
-
1984 article in the
Academy of Management Review
outlined explanations for the success of Japanese management techniques
as:
- Superior manufacturing processes
- Increased quality and quantity coupled with reduced cost
- Participatory management techniques
- Use of statistical quality control techniques
- Consensus decision making
- Lifetime job security (although in 1990's some Japanese companies
moved away from this guarantee)
- Long-term planning